TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Phi Beta Sigma Federal Credit Union vs None Suffer Lack Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Phi Beta Sigma Federal Credit Union

Washington, District of Columbia · Under $100 million in assets

49of 100
Below average

Credit union

None Suffer Lack Federal Credit Union

Suitland, Maryland · Under $100 million in assets

99of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasurePhi Beta Sigma Federal Credit UnionNone Suffer Lack Federal Credit Union
TellerScore4999 (stronger)
Capital cushion51100 (stronger)
Loan quality096 (stronger)
Earnings94100 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage0100 (stronger)
Peer percentile8th99th
Total assets$991K$27.9M
Deposits / shares$895K$22.3M
Capital ratio10.06%20.14% (stronger)
Problem loans13.69%0.12% (stronger)
Net charge-offs5.75%0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets1.84%2.07% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits50.6%11.7% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)1.9%
Offices31
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

None Suffer Lack Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (99 vs 49). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Phi Beta Sigma Federal Credit Union leads on 1 and None Suffer Lack Federal Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions