Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Piedmont Federal Savings Bank vs Taylorsville Savings Bank, SSB
Metric by metric
| Measure | Piedmont Federal Savings Bank | Taylorsville Savings Bank, SSB |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 78 (stronger) | 63 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 31 |
| Loan quality | 95 (stronger) | 87 |
| Earnings | 28 | 55 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 58 | 77 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 99 (stronger) | 92 |
| Peer percentile | 86th | 24th |
| Total assets | $1.3B | $232.4M |
| Deposits / shares | $973.7M | $215.1M |
| Capital ratio | 18.60% (stronger) | 8.08% |
| Problem loans | 0.16% (stronger) | 0.40% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | -0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.21% | 0.88% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 93.5% | 83.3% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 23.2% | 12.5% (stronger) |
| Offices | 10 | 3 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 7.6% | — |
Piedmont Federal Savings Bank has the higher TellerScore (78 vs 63). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Piedmont Federal Savings Bank leads on 3 and Taylorsville Savings Bank, SSB on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.