TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Pilgrim Cucc Federal Credit Union vs Ila 1351 Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Pilgrim Cucc Federal Credit Union

Houston, Texas · Under $100 million in assets

47of 100
Below average

Credit union

Ila 1351 Federal Credit Union

La Porte, Texas · Under $100 million in assets

92of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasurePilgrim Cucc Federal Credit UnionIla 1351 Federal Credit Union
TellerScore4792 (stronger)
Capital cushion71100 (stronger)
Loan quality9100 (stronger)
Earnings468 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)92
Problem-loan coverage77100 (stronger)
Peer percentile7th92nd
Total assets$1.0M$17.3M
Deposits / shares$881K$14.1M
Capital ratio12.10%17.01% (stronger)
Problem loans2.72%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.00%0.00%
Return on assets-0.41%1.20% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits60.2% (stronger)68.4%
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)8.3%
Offices13
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Ila 1351 Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (92 vs 47). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Pilgrim Cucc Federal Credit Union leads on 2 and Ila 1351 Federal Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions