Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Pima Federal Credit Union vs Pyramid Federal Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Pima Federal Credit Union | Pyramid Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 68 (stronger) | 59 |
| Capital cushion | 44 | 56 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 81 (stronger) | 50 |
| Earnings | 68 (stronger) | 37 |
| Funding & liquidity | 82 | 96 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 91 (stronger) | 83 |
| Peer percentile | 50th | 19th |
| Total assets | $1.7B | $247.9M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.5B | $225.2M |
| Capital ratio | 9.40% | 10.57% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.56% (stronger) | 1.51% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.42% (stronger) | 0.52% |
| Return on assets | 1.19% (stronger) | 0.42% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 78.3% | 63.8% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 11.8% | 3.6% (stronger) |
| Offices | 6 | 5 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 21.2% | — |
Pima Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (68 vs 59). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Pima Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and Pyramid Federal Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.