Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Piscataqua Savings Bank vs Claremont Savings Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Piscataqua Savings Bank | Claremont Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 81 (stronger) | 68 |
| Capital cushion | 87 (stronger) | 74 |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 85 |
| Earnings | 35 (stronger) | 34 |
| Funding & liquidity | 89 (stronger) | 58 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 94 |
| Peer percentile | 80th | 37th |
| Total assets | $373.4M | $619.7M |
| Deposits / shares | $298.1M | $473.6M |
| Capital ratio | 13.67% (stronger) | 12.40% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.45% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | -0.02% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.38% (stronger) | 0.35% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 66.0% (stronger) | 102.6% |
| Uninsured deposits | 19.8% | 12.9% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1 | 4 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 19.2% | — |
Piscataqua Savings Bank has the higher TellerScore (81 vs 68). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Piscataqua Savings Bank leads on 5 and Claremont Savings Bank on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.