TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Piscataqua Savings Bank vs Institution for Savings in Newburyport and Its Vicinity

Bank

Piscataqua Savings Bank

Portsmouth, New Hampshire · $100 million – $1 billion

81of 100
Strong

Bank

Institution for Savings in Newburyport and Its Vicinity

Newburyport, Massachusetts · $1 billion – $10 billion

76of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasurePiscataqua Savings BankInstitution for Savings in Newburyport and Its Vicinity
TellerScore81 (stronger)76
Capital cushion87 (stronger)77
Loan quality100 (stronger)99
Earnings3562 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity89 (stronger)36
Problem-loan coverage100100
Peer percentile80th80th
Total assets$373.4M$5.6B
Deposits / shares$298.1M$3.4B
Capital ratio13.67% (stronger)12.66%
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)0.04%
Net charge-offs0.00%-0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets0.38%1.05% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits66.0% (stronger)126.1%
Uninsured deposits19.8% (stronger)27.9%
Offices113
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)19.2%12.4%

Piscataqua Savings Bank has the higher TellerScore (81 vs 76). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Piscataqua Savings Bank leads on 5 and Institution for Savings in Newburyport and Its Vicinity on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions