Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Piscataqua Savings Bank vs Trugrocer Federal Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Piscataqua Savings Bank | Trugrocer Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 81 (stronger) | 73 |
| Capital cushion | 87 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 73 |
| Earnings | 35 (stronger) | 0 |
| Funding & liquidity | 89 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 95 |
| Peer percentile | 80th | 60th |
| Total assets | $373.4M | $320.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $298.1M | $267.8M |
| Capital ratio | 13.67% | 16.03% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.81% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.26% |
| Return on assets | 0.38% (stronger) | -0.85% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 66.0% | 57.3% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 19.8% | 9.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1 | 7 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 19.2% | 12.5% |
Piscataqua Savings Bank has the higher TellerScore (81 vs 73). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Piscataqua Savings Bank leads on 4 and Trugrocer Federal Credit Union on 3. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.