TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Pitney Bowes Employees Federal Credit Union vs Sikorsky Financial Credit Union

Credit union

Pitney Bowes Employees Federal Credit Union

Shelton, Connecticut · Under $100 million in assets

76of 100
Strong

Credit union

Sikorsky Financial Credit Union

Stratford, Connecticut · $1 billion – $10 billion

84of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasurePitney Bowes Employees Federal Credit UnionSikorsky Financial Credit Union
TellerScore7684 (stronger)
Capital cushion100 (stronger)79
Loan quality6092 (stronger)
Earnings3177 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)78
Problem-loan coverage9697 (stronger)
Peer percentile54th93rd
Total assets$57.3M$1.5B
Deposits / shares$45.4M$1.3B
Capital ratio20.25% (stronger)12.93%
Problem loans1.20%0.25% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.22%0.11% (stronger)
Return on assets0.26%1.42% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits23.6% (stronger)82.6%
Uninsured deposits2.6% (stronger)4.7%
Offices311
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Sikorsky Financial Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (84 vs 76). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Pitney Bowes Employees Federal Credit Union leads on 3 and Sikorsky Financial Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions