TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union vs Wabellco Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

76of 100
Strong

Credit union

Wabellco Federal Credit Union

Washington, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

74of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasurePittsburgh Federal Credit UnionWabellco Federal Credit Union
TellerScore76 (stronger)74
Capital cushion53 (stronger)45
Loan quality99100 (stronger)
Earnings5151
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage100100
Peer percentile54th49th
Total assets$11.9M$12.3M
Deposits / shares$10.7M$11.2M
Capital ratio10.28% (stronger)9.54%
Problem loans0.04%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs-0.11% (stronger)0.00%
Return on assets0.77%0.77% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits32.2%28.3% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)1.4%
Offices21
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (76 vs 74). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and Wabellco Federal Credit Union on 3. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions