Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
PrinsBank vs Bridgewater Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | PrinsBank | Bridgewater Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 85 (stronger) | 72 |
| Capital cushion | 70 (stronger) | 66 |
| Loan quality | 90 (stronger) | 84 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 72 |
| Funding & liquidity | 77 (stronger) | 48 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 98 (stronger) | 94 |
| Peer percentile | 88th | 66th |
| Total assets | $308.3M | $5.4B |
| Deposits / shares | $262.9M | $4.4B |
| Capital ratio | 11.99% (stronger) | 11.65% |
| Problem loans | 0.29% (stronger) | 0.49% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.19% | 0.04% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 2.99% (stronger) | 1.30% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 68.0% (stronger) | 100.0% |
| Uninsured deposits | 29.0% | 26.2% (stronger) |
| Offices | 4 | 9 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 4.5% |
PrinsBank has the higher TellerScore (85 vs 72). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), PrinsBank leads on 5 and Bridgewater Bank on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.