Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
ProGrowth Bank vs Sherburne Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | ProGrowth Bank | Sherburne Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 56 | 78 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 21 | 45 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 99 |
| Earnings | 0 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 (stronger) | 63 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 | 100 |
| Peer percentile | 13th | 72nd |
| Total assets | $364.8M | $351.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $327.1M | $289.5M |
| Capital ratio | 7.09% | 9.46% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.02% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.01% | -0.03% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | -1.12% | 2.01% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 24.6% (stronger) | 95.2% |
| Uninsured deposits | 13.1% (stronger) | 17.1% |
| Offices | 3 | 4 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 3.2% |
Sherburne Bank has the higher TellerScore (78 vs 56). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), ProGrowth Bank leads on 3 and Sherburne Bank on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.