Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Raccoon Valley Bank vs Rolling Hills Bank & Trust
Metric by metric
| Measure | Raccoon Valley Bank | Rolling Hills Bank & Trust |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 66 | 77 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 46 | 68 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 75 | 90 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 85 (stronger) | 78 |
| Funding & liquidity | 50 | 57 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 89 | 97 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 31st | 68th |
| Total assets | $486.0M | $484.4M |
| Deposits / shares | $430.2M | $416.2M |
| Capital ratio | 9.57% | 11.85% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.74% | 0.30% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | -0.27% (stronger) | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 1.62% (stronger) | 1.45% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 87.6% (stronger) | 90.9% |
| Uninsured deposits | 35.8% | 26.2% (stronger) |
| Offices | 4 | 12 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 4.3% |
Rolling Hills Bank & Trust has the higher TellerScore (77 vs 66). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Raccoon Valley Bank leads on 3 and Rolling Hills Bank & Trust on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.