Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Range Bank vs First Bank, Upper Michigan
Metric by metric
| Measure | Range Bank | First Bank, Upper Michigan |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 80 | 81 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 58 | 77 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 99 (stronger) | 79 |
| Earnings | 79 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 78 (stronger) | 59 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 93 |
| Peer percentile | 77th | 80th |
| Total assets | $604.1M | $629.5M |
| Deposits / shares | $521.5M | $528.3M |
| Capital ratio | 10.84% | 12.68% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.03% (stronger) | 0.63% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.01% (stronger) | 0.08% |
| Return on assets | 1.47% | 2.03% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 71.4% (stronger) | 84.4% |
| Uninsured deposits | 25.0% (stronger) | 30.0% |
| Offices | 9 | 8 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 2.6% | — |
First Bank, Upper Michigan has the higher TellerScore (81 vs 80). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Range Bank leads on 4 and First Bank, Upper Michigan on 3. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.
Where both have branches
- Marquette, MI
- Kingsford, MI