TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Reading Co-operative Bank vs Cambridge Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union

Bank

Reading Co-operative Bank

Reading, Massachusetts · $1 billion – $10 billion

56of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Cambridge Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union

Cambridge, Massachusetts · Under $100 million in assets

97of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureReading Co-operative BankCambridge Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union
TellerScore5697 (stronger)
Capital cushion23100 (stronger)
Loan quality98 (stronger)96
Earnings3788 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity47100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage99100 (stronger)
Peer percentile15th98th
Total assets$1.2B$10.2M
Deposits / shares$1.0B$7.7M
Capital ratio7.35%24.81% (stronger)
Problem loans0.06% (stronger)0.12%
Net charge-offs0.08%0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets0.42%1.71% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits94.9%40.7% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits31.0%0.0% (stronger)
Offices133
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)13.2%—

Cambridge Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (97 vs 56). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Reading Co-operative Bank leads on 1 and Cambridge Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions