TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Red Lake Co Op Federal Credit Union vs Latvian Credit Union

Credit union

Red Lake Co Op Federal Credit Union

Red Lake Falls, Minnesota · Under $100 million in assets

74of 100
Strong

Credit union

Latvian Credit Union

Minneapolis, Minnesota · Under $100 million in assets

62of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureRed Lake Co Op Federal Credit UnionLatvian Credit Union
TellerScore74 (stronger)62
Capital cushion79 (stronger)60
Loan quality100 (stronger)72
Earnings2035 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity78 (stronger)71
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)88
Peer percentile49th24th
Total assets$7.0M$5.8M
Deposits / shares$6.1M$5.2M
Capital ratio12.88% (stronger)11.01%
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)0.85%
Net charge-offs0.01% (stronger)0.38%
Return on assets0.01%0.37% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits81.8% (stronger)89.1%
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)6.4%
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Red Lake Co Op Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (74 vs 62). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Red Lake Co Op Federal Credit Union leads on 6 and Latvian Credit Union on 1. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions