TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Regional Water Authority Employees Credit Union vs Sikorsky Financial Credit Union

Credit union

Regional Water Authority Employees Credit Union

New Haven, Connecticut · Under $100 million in assets

77of 100
Strong

Credit union

Sikorsky Financial Credit Union

Stratford, Connecticut · $1 billion – $10 billion

84of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureRegional Water Authority Employees Credit UnionSikorsky Financial Credit Union
TellerScore7784 (stronger)
Capital cushion7679 (stronger)
Loan quality100 (stronger)92
Earnings2077 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)78
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)97
Peer percentile57th93rd
Total assets$5.7M$1.5B
Deposits / shares$4.9M$1.3B
Capital ratio12.57%12.93% (stronger)
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)0.25%
Net charge-offs0.61%0.11% (stronger)
Return on assets0.01%1.42% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits27.1% (stronger)82.6%
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)4.7%
Offices111
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Sikorsky Financial Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (84 vs 77). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Regional Water Authority Employees Credit Union leads on 3 and Sikorsky Financial Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions