Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Regions Bank vs First Cahawba Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Regions Bank | First Cahawba Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 64 | 74 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 45 | 58 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 69 | 96 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 78 (stronger) | 65 |
| Funding & liquidity | 59 | 62 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 90 | 98 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 73rd | 57th |
| Total assets | $159.8B | $205.7M |
| Deposits / shares | $131.8B | $186.6M |
| Capital ratio | 9.50% | 10.81% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.93% | 0.12% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.47% | -0.05% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.46% (stronger) | 1.13% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 74.6% (stronger) | 78.7% |
| Uninsured deposits | 39.2% | 33.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1,224 | 5 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | 3,181 | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | 24.1 | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 43.1% | 21.4% |
First Cahawba Bank has the higher TellerScore (74 vs 64). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Regions Bank leads on 2 and First Cahawba Bank on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.