Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
River to River Credit Union vs A.S.H. Employees Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | River to River Credit Union | A.S.H. Employees Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 97 (stronger) | 85 |
| Capital cushion | 97 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 92 (stronger) | 86 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 72 |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 (stronger) | 63 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 98 (stronger) | 97 |
| Peer percentile | 98th | 77th |
| Total assets | $29.7M | $5.6M |
| Deposits / shares | $25.3M | $4.5M |
| Capital ratio | 14.65% | 19.83% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.23% (stronger) | 0.43% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.12% | -0.31% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 2.25% (stronger) | 1.30% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 59.3% (stronger) | 97.4% |
| Uninsured deposits | 0.8% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
River to River Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (97 vs 85). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), River to River Credit Union leads on 4 and A.S.H. Employees Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.