Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Riverside Savings Bank, SSB vs Cedar Hill National Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Riverside Savings Bank, SSB | Cedar Hill National Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 84 | 93 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 100 | 100 |
| Loan quality | 100 | 100 |
| Earnings | 38 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 79 (stronger) | 50 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 | 100 |
| Peer percentile | 76th | 94th |
| Total assets | $94.5M | $16.0M |
| Deposits / shares | $72.5M | $2.0M |
| Capital ratio | 18.78% | 67.56% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 0.46% | 4.79% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 81.3% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 11.2% (stronger) | 87.5% |
| Offices | 1 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Cedar Hill National Bank has the higher TellerScore (93 vs 84). On the 5 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Riverside Savings Bank, SSB leads on 1 and Cedar Hill National Bank on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.