Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Rolling Hills Bank & Trust vs Worthington Federal Savings Bank, FSB
Metric by metric
| Measure | Rolling Hills Bank & Trust | Worthington Federal Savings Bank, FSB |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 77 | 80 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 68 | 98 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 90 (stronger) | 78 |
| Earnings | 78 (stronger) | 45 |
| Funding & liquidity | 57 | 82 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 97 (stronger) | 94 |
| Peer percentile | 68th | 77th |
| Total assets | $484.4M | $135.4M |
| Deposits / shares | $416.2M | $113.3M |
| Capital ratio | 11.85% | 14.83% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.30% (stronger) | 0.65% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.45% (stronger) | 0.61% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 90.9% | 77.9% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 26.2% | 3.9% (stronger) |
| Offices | 12 | 3 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 4.3% | — |
Worthington Federal Savings Bank, FSB has the higher TellerScore (80 vs 77). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Rolling Hills Bank & Trust leads on 2 and Worthington Federal Savings Bank, FSB on 5. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.
Where both have branches
- Worthington, MN