Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Royal Banks of Missouri vs Edward Jones Trust Company
Metric by metric
| Measure | Royal Banks of Missouri | Edward Jones Trust Company |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 70 | 94 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 59 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 95 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 62 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 59 | 61 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 75 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 58th | 98th |
| Total assets | $1.0B | $160.5M |
| Deposits / shares | $891.6M | $500K |
| Capital ratio | 10.93% | 98.18% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.16% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.01% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.05% | 8.54% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 90.1% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 25.2% (stronger) | 50.0% |
| Offices | 16 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Edward Jones Trust Company has the higher TellerScore (94 vs 70). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Royal Banks of Missouri leads on 1 and Edward Jones Trust Company on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.