Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
San Luis Valley Federal Bank vs NBH Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | San Luis Valley Federal Bank | NBH Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 87 (stronger) | 66 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 53 |
| Loan quality | 95 (stronger) | 80 |
| Earnings | 65 (stronger) | 64 |
| Funding & liquidity | 66 (stronger) | 51 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 99 (stronger) | 93 |
| Peer percentile | 91st | 58th |
| Total assets | $390.2M | $12.5B |
| Deposits / shares | $317.9M | $10.6B |
| Capital ratio | 17.98% (stronger) | 10.27% |
| Problem loans | 0.15% (stronger) | 0.60% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.32% |
| Return on assets | 1.13% (stronger) | 1.09% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 88.4% (stronger) | 91.8% |
| Uninsured deposits | 20.6% (stronger) | 30.4% |
| Offices | 3 | 91 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 16.8% |
San Luis Valley Federal Bank has the higher TellerScore (87 vs 66). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), San Luis Valley Federal Bank leads on 7 and NBH Bank on 0. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.