TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Sewickley Savings Bank vs I.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union

Bank

Sewickley Savings Bank

Sewickley, Pennsylvania · $100 million – $1 billion

67of 100
Moderate

Credit union

I.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

98of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureSewickley Savings BankI.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union
TellerScore6798 (stronger)
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality998 (stronger)
Earnings5391 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)99
Problem-loan coverage95100 (stronger)
Peer percentile34th98th
Total assets$316.3M$15.4M
Deposits / shares$222.4M$13.0M
Capital ratio23.76% (stronger)15.39%
Problem loans2.73%0.07% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.00%-0.08% (stronger)
Return on assets0.82%1.78% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits29.8% (stronger)61.6%
Uninsured deposits7.6%0.0% (stronger)
Offices31
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

I.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (98 vs 67). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Sewickley Savings Bank leads on 2 and I.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions