TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Sharon Bank vs Asbestos Workers Local 14 Federal Credit Union

Bank

Sharon Bank

Springfield, Pennsylvania · $100 million – $1 billion

65of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Asbestos Workers Local 14 Federal Credit Union

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

100of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureSharon BankAsbestos Workers Local 14 Federal Credit Union
TellerScore65100 (stronger)
Capital cushion44100 (stronger)
Loan quality95100 (stronger)
Earnings46100 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity68100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage89100 (stronger)
Peer percentile29th100th
Total assets$172.6M$4.1M
Deposits / shares$146.9M$3.5M
Capital ratio9.38%15.40% (stronger)
Problem loans0.16%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.00%0.00%
Return on assets0.65%2.26% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits92.2%21.0% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits11.6%0.0% (stronger)
Offices42
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)8.7%—

Asbestos Workers Local 14 Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (100 vs 65). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Sharon Bank leads on 0 and Asbestos Workers Local 14 Federal Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions