Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Sicily Island State Bank vs United Mississippi Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Sicily Island State Bank | United Mississippi Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 86 (stronger) | 75 |
| Capital cushion | 82 (stronger) | 60 |
| Loan quality | 96 (stronger) | 94 |
| Earnings | 92 (stronger) | 66 |
| Funding & liquidity | 61 | 71 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 98 | 98 |
| Peer percentile | 81st | 61st |
| Total assets | $92.4M | $560.7M |
| Deposits / shares | $72.9M | $478.9M |
| Capital ratio | 13.19% (stronger) | 11.04% |
| Problem loans | 0.13% (stronger) | 0.19% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.05% (stronger) | 0.05% |
| Return on assets | 1.79% (stronger) | 1.15% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 99.6% | 85.7% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 7.0% (stronger) | 18.6% |
| Offices | 2 | 13 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Sicily Island State Bank has the higher TellerScore (86 vs 75). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Sicily Island State Bank leads on 6 and United Mississippi Bank on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.