Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Skowhegan Savings Bank vs Auburn Savings Bank, FSB
Metric by metric
| Measure | Skowhegan Savings Bank | Auburn Savings Bank, FSB |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 88 (stronger) | 56 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 30 |
| Loan quality | 86 | 99 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 83 (stronger) | 27 |
| Funding & liquidity | 66 (stronger) | 48 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 96 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 92nd | 13th |
| Total assets | $855.0M | $103.2M |
| Deposits / shares | $715.3M | $75.9M |
| Capital ratio | 15.81% (stronger) | 8.03% |
| Problem loans | 0.42% | 0.02% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | -0.02% (stronger) | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 1.58% (stronger) | 0.18% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 85.4% (stronger) | 111.6% |
| Uninsured deposits | 22.5% | 17.3% (stronger) |
| Offices | 12 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 11.4% |
Skowhegan Savings Bank has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 56). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Skowhegan Savings Bank leads on 5 and Auburn Savings Bank, FSB on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.