Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Smbc Manubank vs Hana Bank USA, National Association
Metric by metric
| Measure | Smbc Manubank | Hana Bank USA, National Association |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 54 | 88 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 46 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 90 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 0 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 50 (stronger) | 23 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 98 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 12th | 92nd |
| Total assets | $6.6B | $835.2M |
| Deposits / shares | $5.6B | $588.2M |
| Capital ratio | 9.63% | 25.41% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.30% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 3.42% | -0.05% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | -3.56% | 2.91% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 48.2% (stronger) | 86.8% |
| Uninsured deposits | 79.0% | 69.5% (stronger) |
| Offices | 7 | 4 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Hana Bank USA, National Association has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 54). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Smbc Manubank leads on 1 and Hana Bank USA, National Association on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.