TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Southern Chautauqua Federal Credit Union vs N.F.G. #2 Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Southern Chautauqua Federal Credit Union

Lakewood, New York · $100 million – $1 billion

78of 100
Strong

Credit union

N.F.G. #2 Federal Credit Union

Warren, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

80of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureSouthern Chautauqua Federal Credit UnionN.F.G. #2 Federal Credit Union
TellerScore7880 (stronger)
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality4657 (stronger)
Earnings85 (stronger)57
Funding & liquidity74100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage8797 (stronger)
Peer percentile74th65th
Total assets$163.1M$24.2M
Deposits / shares$134.8M$20.5M
Capital ratio17.58% (stronger)15.74%
Problem loans1.61%1.28% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.63% (stronger)0.93%
Return on assets1.62% (stronger)0.91%
Loans ÷ deposits85.9%18.4% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits5.3%0.4% (stronger)
Offices101
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

N.F.G. #2 Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (80 vs 78). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Southern Chautauqua Federal Credit Union leads on 3 and N.F.G. #2 Federal Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions