TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

St. Philip'S Church Federal Credit Union vs Latvian Federal Credit Union

Credit union

St. Philip'S Church Federal Credit Union

New York, New York · Under $100 million in assets

74of 100
Strong

Credit union

Latvian Federal Credit Union

Melville, New York · Under $100 million in assets

88of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureSt. Philip'S Church Federal Credit UnionLatvian Federal Credit Union
TellerScore7488 (stronger)
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality0100 (stronger)
Earnings100 (stronger)42
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage94100 (stronger)
Peer percentile49th85th
Total assets$1.3M$1.8M
Deposits / shares$799K$1.4M
Capital ratio35.45% (stronger)25.25%
Problem loans10.67%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.00%0.00%
Return on assets3.37% (stronger)0.55%
Loans ÷ deposits15.9% (stronger)20.4%
Uninsured deposits0.0%0.0%
Offices21
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Latvian Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 74). On the 5 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), St. Philip'S Church Federal Credit Union leads on 3 and Latvian Federal Credit Union on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions