Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Stockman Bank of Montana vs Badlands Federal Credit Union
Credit union
Badlands Federal Credit Union
Glendive, Montana · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Stockman Bank of Montana | Badlands Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 71 (stronger) | 54 |
| Capital cushion | 49 (stronger) | 31 |
| Loan quality | 80 (stronger) | 52 |
| Earnings | 96 (stronger) | 40 |
| Funding & liquidity | 49 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 93 (stronger) | 89 |
| Peer percentile | 63rd | 13th |
| Total assets | $7.7B | $37.6M |
| Deposits / shares | $6.2B | $34.6M |
| Capital ratio | 9.89% (stronger) | 8.06% |
| Problem loans | 0.60% (stronger) | 1.45% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.02% (stronger) | 0.21% |
| Return on assets | 1.91% (stronger) | 0.49% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 82.9% | 32.4% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 40.1% | 8.3% (stronger) |
| Offices | 45 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 7.6% | — |
Stockman Bank of Montana has the higher TellerScore (71 vs 54). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Stockman Bank of Montana leads on 5 and Badlands Federal Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.
Where both have branches
- Glendive, MT