TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank (U.S.A.) Limited vs Paul Quinn Federal Credit Union

Bank

Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank (U.S.A.) Limited

Hoboken, New Jersey · $1 billion – $10 billion

85of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Paul Quinn Federal Credit Union

Jamaica, New York · Under $100 million in assets

93of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureSumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank (U.S.A.) LimitedPaul Quinn Federal Credit Union
TellerScore8593 (stronger)
Capital cushion77100 (stronger)
Loan quality100100
Earnings97 (stronger)65
Funding & liquidity50100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage100100
Peer percentile97th94th
Total assets$3.9B$358K
Deposits / shares$3.3B$251K
Capital ratio12.72%26.10% (stronger)
Problem loans0.00%0.00%
Net charge-offs0.00%0.00%
Return on assets1.93% (stronger)1.12%
Loans ÷ deposits0.0% (stronger)19.1%
Uninsured deposits92.3%0.0% (stronger)
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Paul Quinn Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (93 vs 85). On the 5 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank (U.S.A.) Limited leads on 2 and Paul Quinn Federal Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions