TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank (U.S.A.) Limited vs Wakefern Federal Credit Union

Bank

Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank (U.S.A.) Limited

Hoboken, New Jersey · $1 billion – $10 billion

85of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Wakefern Federal Credit Union

Elizabeth, New Jersey · Under $100 million in assets

99of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureSumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank (U.S.A.) LimitedWakefern Federal Credit Union
TellerScore8599 (stronger)
Capital cushion77100 (stronger)
Loan quality100 (stronger)96
Earnings97100 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity5099 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage100100
Peer percentile97th99th
Total assets$3.9B$12.0M
Deposits / shares$3.3B$9.1M
Capital ratio12.72%24.31% (stronger)
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)0.13%
Net charge-offs0.00% (stronger)0.09%
Return on assets1.93%2.03% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits0.0% (stronger)42.9%
Uninsured deposits92.3%16.4% (stronger)
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Wakefern Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (99 vs 85). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank (U.S.A.) Limited leads on 3 and Wakefern Federal Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions