Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
TexasBank vs One Source Federal Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | TexasBank | One Source Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 80 (stronger) | 63 |
| Capital cushion | 79 (stronger) | 53 |
| Loan quality | 86 | 91 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 2 |
| Funding & liquidity | 37 | 95 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 90 | 96 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 90th | 29th |
| Total assets | $2.5B | $124.0M |
| Deposits / shares | $2.0B | $110.4M |
| Capital ratio | 12.87% (stronger) | 10.29% |
| Problem loans | 0.41% | 0.27% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.12% (stronger) | 1.52% |
| Return on assets | 2.33% (stronger) | -0.44% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 105.3% | 65.4% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 30.9% | 6.4% (stronger) |
| Offices | 17 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
TexasBank has the higher TellerScore (80 vs 63). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), TexasBank leads on 4 and One Source Federal Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.