Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
The Bank of Forest vs Grand Bank for Savings, FSB
Metric by metric
| Measure | The Bank of Forest | Grand Bank for Savings, FSB |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 68 (stronger) | 64 |
| Capital cushion | 59 | 60 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 57 | 74 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 77 (stronger) | 35 |
| Funding & liquidity | 80 (stronger) | 78 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 84 | 86 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 37th | 26th |
| Total assets | $296.3M | $280.4M |
| Deposits / shares | $269.0M | $246.9M |
| Capital ratio | 10.91% | 10.98% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 1.30% | 0.78% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.04% | -0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.41% (stronger) | 0.39% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 61.1% (stronger) | 82.3% |
| Uninsured deposits | 32.0% | 12.4% (stronger) |
| Offices | 3 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 0.9% | — |
The Bank of Forest has the higher TellerScore (68 vs 64). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), The Bank of Forest leads on 3 and Grand Bank for Savings, FSB on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.