Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
The Cecilian Bank vs Abound Federal Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | The Cecilian Bank | Abound Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 77 | 81 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 60 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 87 (stronger) | 73 |
| Earnings | 87 (stronger) | 61 |
| Funding & liquidity | 66 | 73 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 95 (stronger) | 92 |
| Peer percentile | 83rd | 89th |
| Total assets | $1.6B | $2.8B |
| Deposits / shares | $1.3B | $2.3B |
| Capital ratio | 10.99% | 15.85% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.40% (stronger) | 0.81% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.01% (stronger) | 0.62% |
| Return on assets | 1.67% (stronger) | 1.03% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 79.5% (stronger) | 87.5% |
| Uninsured deposits | 28.6% | 12.9% (stronger) |
| Offices | 19 | 10 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 11.4% | 18.6% |
Abound Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (81 vs 77). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), The Cecilian Bank leads on 4 and Abound Federal Credit Union on 3. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.
Where both have branches
- Elizabethtown, KY
- Radcliff, KY
- Brandenburg, KY