Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
The First National Bank of Manchester vs Bank of Columbia
Metric by metric
| Measure | The First National Bank of Manchester | Bank of Columbia |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 55 | 76 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 49 (stronger) | 43 |
| Loan quality | 46 | 94 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 60 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 61 | 69 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 79 | 97 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 11th | 64th |
| Total assets | $230.1M | $231.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $206.4M | $209.2M |
| Capital ratio | 9.86% (stronger) | 9.31% |
| Problem loans | 1.62% | 0.19% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.03% | 0.02% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.99% | 2.27% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 75.2% (stronger) | 87.5% |
| Uninsured deposits | 36.7% | 18.1% (stronger) |
| Offices | 6 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Bank of Columbia has the higher TellerScore (76 vs 55). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), The First National Bank of Manchester leads on 2 and Bank of Columbia on 5. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.