Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
The Genoa Banking Company vs The Old Fort Banking Company
Metric by metric
| Measure | The Genoa Banking Company | The Old Fort Banking Company |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 62 | 72 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 26 | 39 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 93 |
| Earnings | 54 | 78 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 54 | 78 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 97 |
| Peer percentile | 22nd | 50th |
| Total assets | $747.8M | $843.9M |
| Deposits / shares | $664.7M | $781.8M |
| Capital ratio | 7.58% | 8.89% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.01% (stronger) | 0.20% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.04% | 0.01% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.85% | 1.44% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 84.9% | 61.3% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 34.1% | 33.6% (stronger) |
| Offices | 9 | 10 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 9.8% |
The Old Fort Banking Company has the higher TellerScore (72 vs 62). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), The Genoa Banking Company leads on 1 and The Old Fort Banking Company on 6. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.