Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
The Haverford Trust Company vs Iron Workers Savings Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | The Haverford Trust Company | Iron Workers Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 90 (stronger) | 64 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 41 |
| Loan quality | 100 | 100 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 29 |
| Funding & liquidity | 35 | 75 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 | 100 |
| Peer percentile | 95th | 26th |
| Total assets | $191.0M | $217.5M |
| Deposits / shares | $128.7M | $191.9M |
| Capital ratio | 22.49% (stronger) | 9.13% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 8.63% (stronger) | 0.22% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 100.5% | 85.4% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 37.3% | 10.3% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1 | 3 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 4.3% |
The Haverford Trust Company has the higher TellerScore (90 vs 64). On the 5 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), The Haverford Trust Company leads on 3 and Iron Workers Savings Bank on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.