Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
The Haverford Trust Company vs Sharon Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | The Haverford Trust Company | Sharon Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 90 (stronger) | 65 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 44 |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 95 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 46 |
| Funding & liquidity | 35 | 68 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 89 |
| Peer percentile | 95th | 29th |
| Total assets | $191.0M | $172.6M |
| Deposits / shares | $128.7M | $146.9M |
| Capital ratio | 22.49% (stronger) | 9.38% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.16% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 8.63% (stronger) | 0.65% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 100.5% | 92.2% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 37.3% | 11.6% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1 | 4 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 8.7% |
The Haverford Trust Company has the higher TellerScore (90 vs 65). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), The Haverford Trust Company leads on 4 and Sharon Bank on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.