Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
The Nodaway Valley Bank vs Citizens Federal Savings Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | The Nodaway Valley Bank | Citizens Federal Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 87 (stronger) | 80 |
| Capital cushion | 66 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 95 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 28 |
| Funding & liquidity | 80 (stronger) | 70 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 99 |
| Peer percentile | 98th | 77th |
| Total assets | $1.6B | $190.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.4B | $149.1M |
| Capital ratio | 11.56% | 20.08% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.15% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.04% (stronger) | 0.02% |
| Return on assets | 2.23% (stronger) | 0.19% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 73.3% (stronger) | 90.1% |
| Uninsured deposits | 21.2% | 10.9% (stronger) |
| Offices | 9 | 3 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 5.8% | — |
The Nodaway Valley Bank has the higher TellerScore (87 vs 80). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), The Nodaway Valley Bank leads on 5 and Citizens Federal Savings Bank on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.