Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
The Nodaway Valley Bank vs Mutual Savings Association
Metric by metric
| Measure | The Nodaway Valley Bank | Mutual Savings Association |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 87 (stronger) | 80 |
| Capital cushion | 66 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 63 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 84 |
| Funding & liquidity | 80 (stronger) | 53 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 93 |
| Peer percentile | 98th | 77th |
| Total assets | $1.6B | $398.6M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.4B | $255.7M |
| Capital ratio | 11.56% | 23.84% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 1.11% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.04% (stronger) | -0.01% |
| Return on assets | 2.23% (stronger) | 1.60% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 73.3% (stronger) | 107.2% |
| Uninsured deposits | 21.2% | 11.6% (stronger) |
| Offices | 9 | 6 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 5.8% | — |
The Nodaway Valley Bank has the higher TellerScore (87 vs 80). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), The Nodaway Valley Bank leads on 5 and Mutual Savings Association on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.