Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
The Old Fort Banking Company vs Materion Federal Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | The Old Fort Banking Company | Materion Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 72 | 87 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 39 | 97 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 93 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 78 (stronger) | 41 |
| Funding & liquidity | 78 | 95 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 97 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 50th | 83rd |
| Total assets | $843.9M | $38.9M |
| Deposits / shares | $781.8M | $32.8M |
| Capital ratio | 8.89% | 14.66% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.20% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.01% (stronger) | 0.47% |
| Return on assets | 1.44% (stronger) | 0.52% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 61.3% (stronger) | 65.5% |
| Uninsured deposits | 33.6% | 3.7% (stronger) |
| Offices | 10 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 9.8% | — |
Materion Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (87 vs 72). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), The Old Fort Banking Company leads on 3 and Materion Federal Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.