Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
The State Bank of Toledo vs Chelsea Savings Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | The State Bank of Toledo | Chelsea Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 52 | 93 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 48 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 32 | 92 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 63 | 90 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 66 | 84 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 67 | 98 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 8th | 98th |
| Total assets | $134.6M | $196.9M |
| Deposits / shares | $120.2M | $173.8M |
| Capital ratio | 9.83% | 16.01% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 2.04% | 0.24% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.27% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.07% | 1.75% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 89.9% | 48.2% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 18.6% (stronger) | 29.8% |
| Offices | 2 | 5 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 0.0% |
Chelsea Savings Bank has the higher TellerScore (93 vs 52). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), The State Bank of Toledo leads on 1 and Chelsea Savings Bank on 6. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.