Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Think Mutual Bank vs Expedition Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Think Mutual Bank | Expedition Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 86 (stronger) | 66 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 49 |
| Loan quality | 92 (stronger) | 89 |
| Earnings | 45 (stronger) | 21 |
| Funding & liquidity | 95 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 98 (stronger) | 96 |
| Peer percentile | 97th | 37th |
| Total assets | $2.2B | $223.5M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.9B | $200.8M |
| Capital ratio | 16.25% (stronger) | 9.95% |
| Problem loans | 0.25% (stronger) | 0.34% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.05% (stronger) | 0.39% |
| Return on assets | 0.63% (stronger) | 0.03% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 64.8% | 59.5% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 5.8% | 5.8% (stronger) |
| Offices | 9 | 4 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 12.2% | 18.1% |
Think Mutual Bank has the higher TellerScore (86 vs 66). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Think Mutual Bank leads on 5 and Expedition Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.