Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Think Mutual Bank vs Latvian Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Think Mutual Bank | Latvian Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 86 (stronger) | 62 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 60 |
| Loan quality | 92 (stronger) | 72 |
| Earnings | 45 (stronger) | 35 |
| Funding & liquidity | 95 (stronger) | 71 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 98 (stronger) | 88 |
| Peer percentile | 97th | 24th |
| Total assets | $2.2B | $5.8M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.9B | $5.2M |
| Capital ratio | 16.25% (stronger) | 11.01% |
| Problem loans | 0.25% (stronger) | 0.85% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.05% (stronger) | 0.38% |
| Return on assets | 0.63% (stronger) | 0.37% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 64.8% (stronger) | 89.1% |
| Uninsured deposits | 5.8% (stronger) | 6.4% |
| Offices | 9 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 12.2% | — |
Think Mutual Bank has the higher TellerScore (86 vs 62). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Think Mutual Bank leads on 7 and Latvian Credit Union on 0. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.