Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Three Rivers Bank of Montana vs Glacier Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Three Rivers Bank of Montana | Glacier Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 71 (stronger) | 68 |
| Capital cushion | 67 (stronger) | 51 |
| Loan quality | 69 | 86 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 76 (stronger) | 68 |
| Funding & liquidity | 62 (stronger) | 54 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 87 | 96 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 47th | 66th |
| Total assets | $293.1M | $31.6B |
| Deposits / shares | $257.9M | $24.9B |
| Capital ratio | 11.72% (stronger) | 10.10% |
| Problem loans | 0.93% | 0.42% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.01% (stronger) | 0.08% |
| Return on assets | 1.40% (stronger) | 1.20% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 95.0% | 85.1% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 18.1% (stronger) | 34.0% |
| Offices | 3 | 236 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | 71 |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | 2.9 |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 20.0% |
Three Rivers Bank of Montana has the higher TellerScore (71 vs 68). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Three Rivers Bank of Montana leads on 5 and Glacier Bank on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.