TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Three Rivers Federal Credit Union vs Generations Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Three Rivers Federal Credit Union

Fort Wayne, Indiana · $1 billion – $10 billion

78of 100
Strong

Credit union

Generations Federal Credit Union

LA Porte, Indiana · Under $100 million in assets

88of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureThree Rivers Federal Credit UnionGenerations Federal Credit Union
TellerScore7888 (stronger)
Capital cushion8994 (stronger)
Loan quality5180 (stronger)
Earnings97 (stronger)79
Funding & liquidity7295 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage8695 (stronger)
Peer percentile84th85th
Total assets$2.9B$12.2M
Deposits / shares$2.1B$10.4M
Capital ratio13.88%14.37% (stronger)
Problem loans1.47%0.59% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.43%-0.02% (stronger)
Return on assets1.92% (stronger)1.47%
Loans ÷ deposits86.4%65.2% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits16.3%0.0% (stronger)
Offices112
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)16.3%—

Generations Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 78). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Three Rivers Federal Credit Union leads on 1 and Generations Federal Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions