Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Timberland Bank vs Olympia Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Timberland Bank | Olympia Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 78 (stronger) | 59 |
| Capital cushion | 79 (stronger) | 32 |
| Loan quality | 81 | 87 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 79 (stronger) | 35 |
| Funding & liquidity | 62 | 73 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 94 (stronger) | 92 |
| Peer percentile | 86th | 20th |
| Total assets | $2.1B | $56.3M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.8B | $51.9M |
| Capital ratio | 12.85% (stronger) | 8.18% |
| Problem loans | 0.56% | 0.39% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.46% |
| Return on assets | 1.47% (stronger) | 0.37% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 84.9% (stronger) | 86.9% |
| Uninsured deposits | 26.8% | 3.6% (stronger) |
| Offices | 24 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 17.0% | — |
Timberland Bank has the higher TellerScore (78 vs 59). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Timberland Bank leads on 5 and Olympia Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.