TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Toro Employees Federal Credit Union vs Ideal Credit Union

Credit union

Toro Employees Federal Credit Union

Bloomington, Minnesota · Under $100 million in assets

84of 100
Strong

Credit union

Ideal Credit Union

Woodbury, Minnesota · $1 billion – $10 billion

62of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureToro Employees Federal Credit UnionIdeal Credit Union
TellerScore84 (stronger)62
Capital cushion95 (stronger)58
Loan quality81 (stronger)74
Earnings73 (stronger)42
Funding & liquidity72 (stronger)61
Problem-loan coverage94 (stronger)87
Peer percentile75th30th
Total assets$41.5M$1.1B
Deposits / shares$34.9M$894.8M
Capital ratio14.46% (stronger)10.82%
Problem loans0.56% (stronger)0.79%
Net charge-offs0.30% (stronger)0.60%
Return on assets1.34% (stronger)0.56%
Loans ÷ deposits88.0% (stronger)99.5%
Uninsured deposits4.1%3.9% (stronger)
Offices17
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—23.4%

Toro Employees Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (84 vs 62). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Toro Employees Federal Credit Union leads on 6 and Ideal Credit Union on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions