TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Toro Employees Federal Credit Union vs St. Paul Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Toro Employees Federal Credit Union

Bloomington, Minnesota · Under $100 million in assets

84of 100
Strong

Credit union

St. Paul Federal Credit Union

Saint Paul, Minnesota · $100 million – $1 billion

76of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureToro Employees Federal Credit UnionSt. Paul Federal Credit Union
TellerScore84 (stronger)76
Capital cushion95 (stronger)79
Loan quality8193 (stronger)
Earnings73 (stronger)46
Funding & liquidity72 (stronger)67
Problem-loan coverage9497 (stronger)
Peer percentile75th68th
Total assets$41.5M$252.1M
Deposits / shares$34.9M$215.2M
Capital ratio14.46% (stronger)12.93%
Problem loans0.56%0.20% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.30%0.22% (stronger)
Return on assets1.34% (stronger)0.66%
Loans ÷ deposits88.0% (stronger)92.7%
Uninsured deposits4.1% (stronger)15.5%
Offices13
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—7.5%

Toro Employees Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (84 vs 76). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Toro Employees Federal Credit Union leads on 5 and St. Paul Federal Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions